Daniel Kless

Daniel Kless

PhD Student

Department of Information Systems
The University of Melbourne
Room 2.34, ICT Building, 111 Barry St, Carlton, VIC, Australia

Phone: +61 3 8344 1555
Email: d.klessstudent.unimelb.edu.au

Jump down this page to: Research Interests : Thesis : Publications : Background : Awards

 

Research Interests

Core areas

Formal ontology, thesaurus, Vocabularies, Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS), Information Organization, Knowledge representation, Semantics

Related areas

Library and Information Studies, Information Science, Computer Science (CS), Artificial Intelligence (AI), Semantic Web, Content Management, Information Management, Knowledge Management (KM), Model-driven enginering (MDE), Information Architecture (AI), Information Systems (IS), Information retrieval, Indexing, Tagging, Metadata, Metamodeling, Data modeling, Conceptual modeling

Thesis

Title

Ontological evaluation and reengineering of thesauri

Abstract

The thesis aims at providing guidance and testing the feasibility of reengineering a thesaurus as a terminology into an ontology. For this purpose differences and commonalities of formal ontologies and thesauri are analyzed as well as their respective advantages and disadvantages. Further, methodical approaches to qualitative good modelling of complex domain ontologies are synthesized from literature. Thesauri are analyzed from the viewpoint of the international thesaurus standard ISO 25964 and related standards. The AGROVOC thesaurus is used as a test case for ontological analysis and reengineering.

My thesis approaches ontologies from a commensense realism perspective. I claim that a method for ontological reengineering of thesauri requires

  1. Distinction of concepts into fundamental ontological entities (universals, individuals, categories, properties, etc.)
  2. Alignment of its categories to a disjoint set of upper-level categories
  3. Refinement and formal specfication of its relationships
  4. Correction of its subsumption relations according to metaproperties such as essentiality, identity, unity, or existential dependence

The thesis extends the often deluted comparative understanding of thesauri (as a type of terminology) and ontologies. It also contributes a literature-founded framework for developing qualitatively good ontologies. Finally, arguments for deciding, whether or not to reengineer a thesaurus to an onotology are provided. They can equally support decisions for either type of semantic model.

Supervisors

Dr Simon Milton, Dr Edmund Kazmierczak

[Back to top]

Publications

Papers

Presentations

[Back to top]

Background

Professional

Educational

Professional memberships and social engagement

[Back to top]

Awards

[Back to top]